Corporatism Hides Behind
Useless Political Terminology
This current presidential election process; indeed, President Trump’s four-year term polarized citizens into various camps using political terms that actually have no meaning today. People died, demonstrated and alienated each other over political positions that are essentially meaningless today. Ergo, the war was lost before the battle err began; just to keep you occupied until the real goal could be revealed – when you were too powerless to reject.
Fascism is Government-Corporatism
Partnership led by Government
World War II was primarily a war between various phases of Fascism. Since this aim could not be admitted; support for the war was phrased as a fight against Fascism; their form of fascism. This is why the Allied powers repeatedly used propaganda to sell the war to citizens to go and die or to willingly give up liberties while laboring for their own inevitable slavery to the state. Even after this war the propaganda continued even to our time to keep the truth from YOU. I believe that the Axis powers of Germany and Italy were the death throes of Government being the senior partner over corporatism. Politicians will sale any secret to gain power irrespective of the ultimate goal. They are the quintessential ME people. This is anathema to Corporatism. The time period after the war, known as the Cold War, was devoted to eliminating socialism by governmental force {Soviet Communism} as it disrupted the long-range plans of Corporatism. American hegemony was tolerated as a foil to Soviet Communism; however, once Soviet Communism failed then American hegemony had to be reigned in for the same reason: Government control over Corporatism.
The terms Left and Right were developed in the late 18th century during the French Revolution which was a socialist revolution and not a fight for liberty; the latter was historical propaganda that still exists today. The group for expanding the Revolution sat on the left of the assembly. Those opposing further expansion of revolutionary goals sat on the right side. But make no mistake, both sides were for the revolution and its primarily socialists goals; most of which failed.
Conflated with the terms Left and Right were the terms Conservative and Liberal. Conservatives were pro-government, in this case the Monarchy. Liberals were for the expansion of personal liberties over government; this basically defined the American Revolution in people’s minds even though this was also propaganda for the masses {more on this in coming future posts on Corporatism and Money}. During the 19th century as socialism continued to grow under several guises despite its defeat in France, the meaning of the terms Left and Right along with Conservative and Liberal morphed. This was especially true in America after Lincoln’s War when the power of the federal, central, government over state governments was won by violence of citizen against citizen.
Gradually Conservatism took on the meaning of pro-government based on a stricter interpretation of the Constitution. This view was a nationalist position against change by modern-postmodern {socialistic} forces. Liberal slowly morphed into gradual socialism. This socialism saw government as the main power and corporatism as the junior power financing governments increasing centralization. These lines were hardened after World War II (WWII) when America entered the Cold War to prevent the spread of Communism {Soviet socialism perpetuated by governmental violence}. However, Conservatism suffered a major blow due to its focus on isolation from international wars. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was simply the first salvo against Conservatism. After this war the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was formed and instituted an infiltration program called Mockingbird; control of America’s media organs of information. William F. Buckley Jr. nearly single-handedly redefined Conservatism as a movement to support American hegemony abroad. This was diametrically opposite the movement’s aims pre-WWII. Liberals also changed from expanding national government’s power to expanding international socialism’s power over American sovereignty.
The Republicans grew out of the Federalist-Whig parties which always sought to increase governmental power via wars and tariffs {taxes on imports}. Lincoln solidified Republican hegemony by attacking and defeating part of the country he had sworn to protect. Prior to this war, America was divided between North and South. North was defined itself as the industrial base and did enjoy the benefits of the Industrial Revolution but also fell under the sway of the financiers of the day. The Democrats were the revenue producing section due to their large agrarian exports. However due to technological limitations of the day these crops required large amounts of labor which was historically supplied via slavery. But the industrial revolution was slowly coming to the South and slavery was becoming too expensive. Democratic South would not jettison its addiction to slavery and unwisely made it the distinctive quality between North and South. This was not true. The South represented State power over Federal power and local banks with adequate reserves of actual wealth over central or national banks based on little wealth reserves. President Lincoln skillfully used the slavery issue to mobilize support for his war after he failed to obtain quick military victories; purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation.
When Southern Democrats were allowed back into government following Lincoln’s War (Political) Reconstruction, they retained their state’s rights orientation but also their slavery bias via Jim Crow Laws. Not learning from history, this set them up for defeat until the mid-20th century when the Democratic party gained a new focus: international socialism. Republicans retained their national power orientation but lost power due to Corporatism that began in the Progressive Era. This was exacerbated when Democrats under both FDR and LBJ were able to copy Lincoln’s example and co-opted poverty as a central plank. However, just as Lincoln had no intention of freeing slaves or allowing them into Republican-controlled territories, these Democrats had no intention of raising certain groups out of poverty. Government handouts were so effective in neutralizing the American Indians, rurally, that the Democrats uses this methodology to create urban reservations from which to harvest votes. Thus, they slowly became the more powerful party. This change of focus in American politics also began to make the terms Left and Right; Conservative and Liberal meaningless.
The Progressive Era was not simply the marriage of government to corporations; it was the transition from government-control to corporate-control via behind the scenes financiers who had no qualms about supporting each side to achieve their long-term goal of globalization via international socialism.
Murray Rothbard’s book, The Progressive Era, showed which financial institutions backed which candidates to advance their agenda. For example, they enticed T. Roosevelt to form his Bull Moose party and run against both Wilson (D) and Taft (R) so Wilson could win and usher in the Corporate Revolution of 1913: Federal Reserve; Popular Election of Senators; and the Individual Income Tax. This was the birth of Corporatism’s control in America. This was extended internationally during and after WWII with the Bretton Wood’s Declaration making America’s dollar the de facto international currency; controlled by international financiers.
Pro-Trumpers Were Fighting the
Deep State Fallacy: Not Corporatism
President Trump was never Right nor Conservative nor even non-Socialist; he was always a national corporatist against international financiers. Most Republicans and nearly all Democrats were in bed with international financiers and thus opposed him. Like William Jennings Bryant, Trump gained a populist following that was doomed to fail, as it did to Bryant, because the real enemy hid behind the scenes. His draining the swamp metaphor did not include his kind of corporatism.
Great Reset will Replace the
Hegemony of America’s Dollar
These terms of past eras live on because they are meaningless except to control and direct various movements: Antifa; Populist; Black Lives Matter; White Supremacy and the list goes ever onward. However, before we can explore the tyranny of financiers, we must learn the role of money in politics. Stop using and responding to the meaningless terms of past eras to discover the delusion robbing you of truth (2Th 2:3-12).